Kenneth Rijock

Kenneth Rijock

Sunday, May 20, 2018


If you live in the Caribbean, you know that the Commonwealth of Dominica has been stripped of its voting rights in the United Nations General Assembly, for failure to pay dues for a period of two years. Considering that the country's government is taking in millions each year, from its Citizenship by Investment, or economic passport, program, it makes you wonder into whose pockets all that money is going.

More importantly, the United Nations should eject Dominica from its membership, not for that reason, but for one much more serious; its outlaw diplomatic passport program, which freely sells passports that do not comply with international law, to career criminals, international sanctions evaders, corrupt government officials, organized crime members, and just about any other type of lowlife who would benefit from a tool that facilitates crime or terrorism. Do you have two or three million dolars in criminal proceeds on hand ? Then you can become an instant diplomat.

The officials in power in Dominica have sold, for US Dollars, passports that violate the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, to which all UN members, as signatories, are bound. They really do not give a damn about international law, believing that national sovereignty protects their criminal enterprise. In the meanwhile, over five hundred Dominica diplomatic passports have been issued by a government that is engaged in racketeering for profit.

The most effective remedy available to solve this problem is for the UN to remove Dominica from membership and to declare all diplomatic passports issued by it null and void. The United States, Canada and the UK are considering how to impose sanctions, but it is also up to the United Nations to act; Throw the bums out.


The complaints about what is called "de-risking" continue to roll in, especially from the financial institutions in the Caribbean. Those banks bitterly relate tales of abrupt cancellation of long-term correspondent relationships with American financial institutions, and their often desperate quest to find alternatives, only to learn that the increased costs will probably have to be passed along to the class of client who can least afford it, expats sending remittances, and the recipients of those payments, which they do not want.

It is not a conundrum; the affected banks all have access to programs that create the Know Your Customers' Customers, or KYCC, that American banks now demand. if I am a compliance officer in a New York bank, I want to have immediate acccess to the Caribbean bank's customers, his transactions, personal information, account history, and lines of business. Basically  it isall those things that are part of his client story, so that I may reduce my risk of being involved in his US transactions.

Compliance officers know, or should know, that KYCC programs can be installed that give the USA bank a window into the Caribbean banks' customers, their recoreds, and their transactions, on a real-time basis. Unfortunately, due to cost concerns, fears about losing clients to local competitors, and pressure from clients to maintain confidentiality, most Caribbean banks fail to engage in KYCC programs, and their eventual loss of correspondent relationships, due to increasingly intrusive regulatory actions against US banks and bankers, is only a matter of time.

My advice to compliance officers at Caribbean financial institutions, adopt a program that affords onshore US banks KYCC access to your clients' information, before you get the final notice of impending closure of your prized correspondent accounts in New York. Loss of access to the US banking structure, even temporarily, can result in massive client flight, and eventual insolvency. Pay attention, and solve this problem, before your bank becomes a fatality of de-risking.


The perfect storm for armed conflict in Lebanon, due to Hezbollah's new monopoly on political power, in the wake of recent elections there, and other factors, could result in a total disruption of the Beirut banking industry, the country's remaining significant asset.

The additional reasons for concern:

(1) The Trump Administration has just sanctioned the senior Hezbollah leadership, and America's total support of Israel has angered that specially designated global terrorist organization. Bellicose statements from the newly-sanctioned Nasrallah, against the US Embassy opening in Jerusalem, as well as Isreal, has increased.

(2) With the winding down of the anti-ISIS war in Syria, Hezbollah has combat-experienced fighters available to it, and they hold strategic positions close to the northern Israeli border.

(3) Israel's military has increased its readiness in its north, especially in the Golan Heights region. Hezbollah feels its is invincible, due to its Iranian missile inventory.

(4) A leading Israeli politician has bluntly warned that, should Hezbollah initiate hostilities, has country will formally declare war on Lebanon, and not limit its response to the area under Hezbollah control, south of the Litani River. If the missiles fall on Israeli population centers, count on a massive aerial response, and since Israel can maintain air superiority, Beirut could end up looking like Berlin in 1945.
If the Beirut banking center is attacked, even if alternate security arrangement have been carriec out in advance, Middle East money will think twice before continuing to patronize the city's banks, and massive capital flight is a distinct possibility.

This is probably a good time to reduce your risks regarding Lebanon, whether it be financial exposure, outstanding receivables, or pending matters. for war is not just possible, it is fast becoming probable.

Saturday, May 19, 2018


Use of US Dollars can confer extraterritorial jurisdiction of US Courts
The issues that compliance officers at North American banks, and US & Canadian immigration officers, have with holders of Citizenship by Investment (CBI) passports have been reported in the financial press of late, but there is a more serious problem that the five East Cabibbesn CBI states are facing: the threat of criminal prosecution, by the US Department of Justice, for violations of money laundering laws by government leaders, notwithstanding that they operate these probems outside the Unted States.

The problems the EC states have is that US money laundering laws confer what is known as extraterritorial jurisdiction upon foreign nationals, and this is occurring because the Caribbean attorneys who created CBI legislation committed what some legal experts regard as a fatal error: they adopted provisions in their CBI laws that allowed CBI program managers to accept US Dollars (USD$) as payment for their economic citizenships. That has has been judged to be a major error.

Why is this now actually considered legal malpractice ? Any attorney drafting legislation in his country should be aware of the possbility that the laws he is creating might increase specific risks in other jurisdictions, and carefully weigh the potential consequences with his client before recommending that they be enacted into law.

In this case, most attorneys in the Caribbean are aware of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 (18 USC §§1956-1957), which imposes a maximum penalty of twenty years for violations, plus a mega-fine. The lawyers drafting CBI legislation ibn the East Caribbean failed to research that statute in depth, for if they had they would have learned that it has extraterritorial jurisdiction.

This means that a foreign national could be charged if the US Dollars they accept, for any purpose, are the proceeds of what are referred to Specified Unlawful Activities, and any portion of the transaction has a connection (nexus) with the United States, such as being deposited in a US bank, or transiting the American financial system. The MLCA, which was strengthened by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, will reach out and touch foreign nationals (e.g Reza Zarrab), for acts that they committed totally outside the USA.

Therefore, any dodgy applicant, using criminal proceeds for his cash to purchase that CBI passport, which is later deposited in a dollar account, and ends up passing into, or through, a US financial institution, has implicated not only himself, but the CBI program, and the country's leadership, as well, under US law.

We doubt that the Caribbean attorneys tasked with drafting their local CBI laws even bothered to look at the possible negative consequences of accepting US currency. They probably used the pioneering St Kitts & Nevis CBI program as a template. Unfortunately, that program became law back in 1984, two years before money laundering became a federal crime. Why didn't someone realize that using US Dollars might have consequences ?

Should the CBI program directors, and their attorneys, have chosen the Pound Sterling, instead of the US Dollar ?  Probably so, given the extraterritoriality issue, as well as the fact that the USA has very broad conspiracy laws, unlike the UK, which adds to the undesireability of accepting US Dollars, unless you are completely sure of the Source of Funds, and of your applicant's bona fides.

We understand that the leaders of a number of the East Caribbean CBI states are feeling anxious of late; are they feeling a cold chill, perhaps coming from the possibility that the US Department of Justice might be investigating them ?  

Friday, May 18, 2018


There has been much talk, in the five East Caribbean states operating a Citiznenship by Investment (CBI) program, about reform, especially regarding the need to perform Enhanced Due Diligence upon all applicants, and lookbacks upon all existing CBI passport holders. For those prime ministers in those countries, you only need look back to see what could happen to your own coveted US visa, shouls you fail to implement  those reforms forthwith.

When the elected leaders of St Kitts & Nevis failed to clean up the many flaws in their CBI program, after a number of official complaints were lodged by the American Secretary of State, John Kerry, the US cancelled the US visa of the then St Kitts Prime Minister, Denzil Douglas. Additionally, FinCEN issued its now notorious Advisory, warning the financial world about US concerns regarding all St Kitts CBI passports. The lesson; there are consequences if you ignore your international compliance responsibilities, after you are duly warned by Uncle Sam. Your prime minister might lose the right to shop in Miami or New York, and your voters will quickly tire of their long trips to the US Embassy in Barbados, while applying for visas, and of you as their elected leader.

Even after Mr. Douglas left office, in 2015, the United States has declined to reisue or reinstate his visa to enter the country, though we know that Douglas has requested his visa, as a private citizen. Also, Canada imposed visa entry requirements for all St Kitts passport holders.

For those CBI jurisdictions who keep repeating that the United States does not impose any sanctions for their continued failure to implement significant reforms, ask Denzil Douglas, who has not been in America for seveal years, and ask those Kittitian businessmen who must buy goods and equipment in repeated buying trips to the US, and now need submit to the tedious visa application process. We trust this has been instructive to the five sitting prime ministers in the EC CBI states.


My one hour interview on current Dominica and Antigua issues, which was heard this week on TDN Radio Caribbean, is now available as an audio file free to any reader who wishes to hear it. Kindly email me at :  and I will be happy to send it off to your email address.

Please note that it is 22Mb, and your email program must be able to accept a file of that size.

Thursday, May 17, 2018



Citing South Korean newspaper articles, a story in a security publication noted that a senior North Korean colonel, assigned to a special unit, has defected while in China, and that he allegedly took with him the printing plates for the "Supernote," the most recent version of the North Korean counterfeit USD $100 note. One example of the Supernote, the US Series 2006, was found late last year by a teller at KEB Bank in Seoul, and it took a team of experts to deduce that it was indeed a counterfeit.

This version of the Supernote has not, to date, been seen in global circulation, though massive amounts of the bills are known to exist in cold storage, and have been so stored since they were manufactured by the DPRK, more than a decade ago. There is a report from Singapore, where quantities of the Supernote was offered for sale by criminal elements, at the astounding price of 50 cents on a dollar of face value. This asking price is far in excess of the typical market price counterfeits realize, which is probably a testament to the quality of  these latest Supernotes. The current holders of the stored notes are said to be Korea's largest organized crime syndicate, which operates in South Korea, but has ties to the DPRK, as is alleged to have created the printing plates, and transferred them to North Korea.

Are the printing plates in the hands of the Peoples' Republic of China, which reportedly already has a large quantity of the notes on hand ? We cannot say, but the mystery surrounding the elusive 2006 Supernote continues to grow.